[NC2012] - Questions and Answers

[Alex_C]

That's pretty odd if you ask me Alex, sorry for taking up your thread.

But don't you think substitutions should be for replacing a member, not just removing one?

Moved from substitutions thread.

[Alex_C]

That's pretty odd if you ask me Alex, sorry for taking up your thread.

But don't you think substitutions should be for replacing a member, not just removing one?

Ideally all teams would be at 16 members all the time, to allow for a maximum chance of playing a full team. This is why removing and adding a player at the same time count as only one substitution chance.

Simply removing a player without adding another doesn't really seem to serve any purpose, but would potentially weaken a team and make reschedules etc. more likely.

[Lares_RS]

Hm, its not sub, just wanna remove guys who don't play anymore. Anyway, this removing wouldnt make us weak, cause nothing won't change.

[Chaingun]

I think Lares wants to make sure that "the honor" if winning will belong to those who really played on UA team.

[Newbiejunky]

I think that this rule is obsolet for the final. Teams have been playing all tournament long and removing some players for their inactivity will not aweak them. Additionaly, as Chaingun said, only people who deserve the honor of the final should stay on the roster.

[aswex200]

when is the nc2013 starting?

[Andrej1]

when is the nc2013 starting?

2013   

[Golradir]

when is the nc2013 starting?

In 2 months.