Just want to clarify something. İsa (Christ) is an ancestor of Muhammed (and their ancestors are Sumerian. The first ancestor of Muhammed who learned how to speak Arabic was Ismail). They are from the same family which is Kureyş. The word itself is related to "Guru" and I don't want to talk about the Turkic roots of the word (for obvious reasons..).. Unfortunately, most of what is known about İsa was destroyed (or hidden) by these powermongers during Roman times. So the only thing which talks about İsa are the bibles.
The Kureyş family is among what Arabs call "Arab-ı Müsta’ribe". It means "people that were not Arabic in the past".
The Kureyş family was called "hanif" by the Romans. Just like people living in Russia in old times. The word have two different meanings. 1-People that are not superstitious, that do not worship idols, people, etc. 2-People that are not Christians . The two meanings could be related to each other or maybe not.
Abraham married a Turkic (don't know her ethnicity) princess named Kan Tura (Lady Tura?) according to Syrian historian Ebul Ferec and also İbnü’l-İbri. So their descendents (including İsa (Christ) and Muhammed) are half Turkic - half Sumerian. But this does not necessarily mean they share the same cultural traits. Because they grew up it totally different cultural environments. Still, anyone can be a good person regardless of being an Aztec, Turkish, Greek, Chinese, or African.
Tura might be one of these head scarves: http://kadinbasliklari.blogcu.com/turk-kadin-basliklari/2409102
which is adorned with many of things like this: http://www.ancienttouch.com/127.jpg
There were several attempts of Christianization. And they were all vain. The legend of the alleged Baptism of Kievan Russia in the X century remains just a popular legend having no historical proofs.
Having despaired to find way to the East, the Byzantines called those western people “Hanifs” and their belief – “Hanif confession” considering it to be stronger than Christian belief… Later Macarius, the Patriarch of Antioch, acknowledged that telling in the XVII century of his visiting Moscow Russia.
Having declared of the Latin Empire in the XIII century, the West decided to repeat the route of the Greek Christians in order to deny a theory of impregnability of the East. And thus to strengthen its positions. A painstaking preparation of an ideological aggression, that lasted for centuries, commenced. The game was worth the candle since it could extend the boundaries of the Christian Empire for thousands of kilometers – beyond Ural, which strengthened the power of the Pope to whom even the Byzantines bowed their heads, but not the “Hanifs”…
Looking ahead, let us say that finally the Catholics managed to destroy the “Hanif belief” – they destroyed it through Romanovs, the Russian tsars. That dynasty executed the Pope's purpose – having destroyed the old belief, it launched Christianity in Russia, introduced western innovations and destroyed old traditions, in a word, it deprived the West of its national culture and entity… In fact, that’s what our book is about – every page of it tells of an unknown tragedy.
Russia was slowly deepening into unconsciousness, turning the nation into slaves (cp. the Slavs). The Russians paid a dreadful price for the coming of Christianity, for its introduction to the West.
Paving the way for a new culture, Romanovs made the nation forget its native land – the country that existed before Russia and Rus – on pain of death. Romanovs needed neither the old belief in Heavenly God, nor the old past – they were preparing their new past, bringing lies to the forefront.
Russia, or most of it, to put it more preciously, was formerly called Dest-I-Kipchak. That was a powerful steppe country extending from Baikal to the Alps – probably the most powerful country in the world. The Roman Empire paid levy to it in the IV – V centuries. Former greatness of the steppe country was to be forgotten: those were bad memories for the West. Even certain allusions.
Historians turned the most powerful country of the Middle Ages into the “Wild Field”, into the back of beyond, and its nation which could be conquered neither by a sword nor by a word – into “wild nomads” and “pagan Tatars”. These are key words in the official Russian history – that’s how ancestors are now called in Russia.
Steppe nation has become a castaway at home; it hasn’t been able to recollect itself for ages. It was told a lot of lies and sent to sleep. It has obediently fallen asleep…
Romanovs appeared unexpectedly in the Russian politics – there were no people with that non-Russian family name in Russia. Puny Michael Zakhariev-Koshkin, the founder of the dynasty, took it in 1613 – he realized that having become “Romanov” he would become “Roman”. That was the son of the Russian false Patriarch Filaret, the very same Filaret that obtained clerical titles from Ljedmitriy 1, and was made Patriarch by Ljedmitriy 2. The person who graduated from a Jesuitical college in Vilno turned out to be among the first Russian Jesuits.
Thus, following the scenario of the Third Rome, the eastern part of Europe was turned into a colony of an invisible Latin (Christian) Empire. They called those times the times of troubles. Everything sort of happened of its own accord. In order to choose a new, “their” tsar, the Pope's monks that managed to come to Moscow destroyed the former dynasty. Most of Riurikoviches were simply poisoned with arsenic and mercury, which was proven by modern experts. And the main reason of that was their reluctance to conspire with Rome – Ivan the Terrible refused to accept Christianity and the Pope's power voluntarily.
Analysis of the time of troubles evinced the truth.
… Who are they, those “Halifs” with their strong belief? Unfortunately, Russian history dissembles it; chroniclers of Romanovs' Moscow deliberately misrepresented the facts. That’s why they started history of Russia from the misty IX century, from Kiev. They invented the baptism of Russia, Bosporus and Scythia, “ancient Russian” cities which in fact were the cities of Desht-I-Kipchak, as well as the Slavs and the Scythians in order to conceal the Turki who had been living in steppes lying from Altai to the Alps from of old. They even concealed that steppe inhabitants called themselves the Kipchaks (Kypchaks). That’s how the steppe nation called itself.
Muslims think that the bible was corrupted by powermongers. Quran talks about it.
In my opinion, those evil powermongers were a branch of expelled Turks who influenced those whoever wrote the pieces of bible.
Muslim Turks won't burn down any holy book because they revere them since according to them, all religious books hold some correct information. It's not because Muslims are better people or more tolerant of other cultures.