Moscow was a Turkic city between 1243-1502. It gradually changed into Ex-Turk. (the time between 1243 and 1502 was just a dying sparkle)Taken from Wiki:
The first reference to Moscow dates from 1147 as a meeting place of Yuri Dolgorukiy and Sviatoslav Olgovich. At the time it was a minor town on the western border of Vladimir-Suzdal Principality.
In 1156, Knjaz Yury Dolgoruky fortified the town with a timber fence and a moat. In the course of the Mongol invasion of Rus, the Golden Horde burned the city to the ground and killed its inhabitants.
The timber fort na Moskvě "on the Moscow river" was inherited by Daniel, the youngest son of Alexander Nevsky, in the 1260s, at the time considered the least valuable of his father's possessions
So it wasn't a city, at most it was a fortified town. which was destroyed by the mongols, so its safe to assume that the majority of the population was slaughtered...therefore it was no longer a city or town but a ruin.
Dying sparkle? what? it was only founded a century before hand, and it is still around today. so what is this dying sparkle?
Like the rest of the Europe... But people always remained that were aware of their Turkic identity. first lets ask the Europeans about their Turk identities...
Second: moscow was first settled by Varangians, a couple other Slavic tribes, and then the Volga Bulgars. so plenty of other people have a claim.
Russians or Eurasians were never Latin. They were Latinized as a result of a huge genocide of unbelievable proportion.I don't believe that their language is based on Latin...sooooooo, they still aren't "Latinized".
and where are the bodies of this "huge genocide of unbelievable proportion", without the bodies there is no crime, and was no genocide.
1-) Russia history is older than what is officially written by Russians. Tell me what a Romanov is. Tell me how they poisoned the Turks ruling those lands.
2-) Varangians are a mix of Turks and Scandinavians. They are "land renters" and definitely related to English. Maybe relayed to Turkic "ang" meaning "booty"
3-) The genocide is mostly a cultural genocide which was continued by Stalinist Russia and Hitler's Germany on par with the added "killings". The "Jews" in Germany were simply Turks.
Basicly Turks were the medium between world languages from the start. That's why Arabs called translators as Tercüman which comes from "Türkomen".
My theory is that translator is a compressed Turkic sentence. "turan söyle eter" :
Turan: related to Tur people. basic meaning of "to come back". Related to "tura" which is the picture of the ruler on the back of coins. The coin always comes back to the ruler.
Söyle: say, speak
eter: "he does this thing"
(so any English word ending with "ator", "etor", ... actually carries the meaning of "he does this thing... The first vowel stands for Turkic O meaning he,she,it. The second "to" (which is related with "to do") is a corrupted form of Turkic te, to, ta, tu suffix which gives the word the meaning of "does, do". The last "R" letter stands for Turkic suffix giving the word the meaning of "his existence is for doing xxx" (Turkish eder< from Proto language "esi er"). If that R is omitted than we are left with "may he do~ to exists as xxx" (ede< esi)
Basically this word is related to "trans", "through" and even "true". These are all related with Turks being the carrier of civilization to rest of the world and than carrying the corrupted languages of the world back to Asia. Naturally they had the ability to speak both the true proto language which is Turkic and the rest of the made up languages of the world. In my opinion most of these people were the clergy that did the corrupting in the first place.
Since the word Tur or Turk itself is related with "descended being", "a being transferred to a body", "a being with töre" (meaning someone true), "someone with the ability to travel", most of these words (even including travel) are related with the word TURK itself.