Mount&Blade: Warband > The King's Court - Suggestions

Archers; Too heavily armed

<< < (118/122) > >>

brognar:

--- Quote from: Jakob Zaborowski on April 27, 2012, 04:06:17 PM ---
--- Quote from: AWdeV on April 27, 2012, 12:34:47 PM ---He didn't say either of those things in the post you quoted.

--- End quote ---

He had said them several times previous, I only quoted it so everyone knew who I was talking about.

--- End quote ---
And so logically you respond with an unprovoked ad hominem attack; how intelligent.

It irks me when the concise presentation of fact is misinterpreted as condescension.

Blackthorn:

--- Quote ---Maybe people will be more willing to listen to you if you did not speak like a massive ass.

--- End quote ---

... whereas you are both clearly witty and a gentleman. I salute your ability to mash at the keyboard with bile and ignorance. That must have taken your keyworker a long time to teach you.
x x x

codex:
I don't that they are to heavily armed, my reasoning is that they suck at most points and all you need is a shield anyway. I understand at some points they get to your breaking point because they just wont stop attacking you but its not that hard to kill them. Even your on troops aren't OP, it seems to me that the melee those all the work for me.

bjcs333:
True i think that archers are not only to powerful in melee but also in range which is why i think they should:
1.have no clothes at all
2.have the ability to move taken away from them
3.Instead of a bow they have to use stones
4.no swords they can just use their bare fists!
5.only 10 hp
6.when ever they throw a stone they must take 60% of the damage they cause

after this i think those over powered basterds should be pretty balenced.

DragzJoker:
yup, they are too well armed to fight in melee the Nord veteran Archer has A very good sword and a Brynie

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version