Theo H said:
sirballington said:
Playing as Nords have really spoiled me. Huscarls roll over everyone. I'm now playing as a Swadian vassal, and I've lost too many times, even against equal numbers. I need a new strategy, and my Men-at-arms die too easily because they like to get mobbed by infantry. Don't have land either, so veteran units are scarce, while I had 83 veterans waiting to be recruited when I was Nord.
The amount of health the elite huscarls have is staggering. though the elite version are rare in lord armies though (In hard mode at least)....only praven knights can stand up to them and if praven falls in war time and you lose access then your ****ed on harder difficulties. Elite footmen and sergeants can only hold back the nords for so long.
Its a shame the standard swadian knight was removed.
Yeah, I'm losing a lot more often now. I tend to stick to infantry-only army. I feel like with the new AI (enemies don't just charge or make a long single-line revolving formation), cavalry requires too much micromanagement to work against bunched up infantries. It's good for commanders who stay back and give orders, but with how many troops I can kill by myself, I have to be in the thick of the action.
It's definitely a much bigger challenge than playing as Nords. I lost two cities because I'd take it, then ask for it to be rewarded to me, and in the meantime everyone comes and takes it back within a few days. 0 garrison. At least as king it autofills the garrison with a hundred or so men. Nothing great, but at least it slows them a bit.
I think the Swadian Knight was moved over to Player Faction, but yeah, regular men-at-arms are more trouble than they're worth.