Thank u
Where is the lore stuff there?
Whoever is the lead writer hasn't wrote much, since all the Mount and Blade where player has agency is up to whatever it happens during the game. And i have 70% of certainty they don't have proper story writers
Well i understand but I just feel like bannerlord feels like a team death between The factions lol. Each faction should have a story mode
To have lore they would need more writers dedicated on creating stories, timelines, people, battles, etc.
Basically yes lol. I don't "create narratives" or scrips and try to follow them, I just look back and what's happened and try to rationalize a story out of it lol. It's pretty easy to do so with this game and Warband, and I prefer this way over more conventional storytelling, but I do think it'd be nice if there was more established lore, faction individuality, and character distinction (like, basically, if Calradia had its Daggerfall equivalent via its Ted Peterson equivalent instead of being stuck in the Arena phase where the lore isn't really a thing yet).
Yeah, I mean it's the fun of it, Kenshi also follows this line of "making your own story as you play" but it will always be a problem for me that the game doesn't provide more contexts for this to happen. They're slowly increasing interaction with characters but I think a game of this scale requires the double of what it provides. For me it's essential that rivalries, and a more extreme diversity is put in place for it to happen. For example, there's a lack of religion in the game, something absolutely important in these times, a reason for casus belli even, I understand why they would ommit religion for example but provided this is fiction based on reality they could get away with adding some sort of Christianity, Muslim and Celtic religion without necessarily copying them 1:1. It would provide way more context for the player to interact in and raise in power.
It's not that I don't agree with you, but they would gain almost nothing from adding religion to the game except for lots of headache. Just adding culture specific customs and rituals would be much better than religion imo.
FACTS!
Yes, I agree. More meaningful diversity would be good. The only qualifier is to avoid making fictional religions too obviously similar to real ones since, well, I suspect that might be illegal for Taleworlds to do and also alienate the international player base. They could easily make fictitious religions with believable ethics and structure, though, but that might tie back into the whole "they need a Ted Peterson or Micheal Kirkbride" thing I said above since what seems "easy" to me is probably very difficult for somebody not used to making things up for a living lol. I wouldn't want a hack-job of implausible-to-worship joke religions and you might need a professional to make things like the Aedra and Daedra or (especially) the Tribunal of TES. EDITED to add: Actually, maybe the devs just want to do it justice and don't want to do it without certainty in their competence. The more I think about it, the more I realize most game worlds are terrible at creating and depicting religious (outside of them being more or less decorative, like in Dragon Warrior/Quest games) since they tend to be... hard to appreciate, as in, hard to imagine myself being a part of if I had a choice in their universe. The Tribunal might be the best fictional religion I've ever played with since they actually have a lot of substance to their appearances (and it helps their gods are not only active in governing their country but visible and approachable). Usually, they're too alien to take seriously or portrayed too negatively.
