Silver said:
Hm... I'd sacrifice both my nuts and more to know what happened
Ooh!
Silver said:
I'd say none of Sir Devlyn's theories make sense, but I guess we've established that already. What I would like to know is if they guy that left early did so because of radiation poisoning. He left because of health issues, but what health issues it didn't say.
I'd say Sir Devlyn's link is pretty much bull**** as well. It sounds like an arrogant teen with too much time on his/her hands that wants to sound important by solving a mystery, and does it in the same style as it would be done on a tv-show.
I think the lack of info is what makes speculation so difficult.
How much radiation was present? Did it affect all, or only some? Was it only on their clothes, or present in their bodies? Was it massively high, or just enough to register exposure to something?
The link I shared suggests that the violence group all had their clothes on, while the other group didn't. Did the other group leave dressed, strip later from hypothermia, or strip due to some other reason?
When it says the violence group had major internal injuries but no external wounding, how far does that go? Was their skin perfectly clear and normal, slightly bruised, or bruised yet have no cuts? How knowledgeable were the experts who examined the bodies? Nothing I read gave even one possible explanation for what could cause crushed skulls and broken ribs, other than a "car crash". Was it possible for the first group to fall off a cliff, or somesuch?
Did they walk away from their site, or did they run? Did they take off screaming into a blizzard in the middle of the night in their underwear, or did they have time to hurriedly dress and make a hasty withdrawal?
All of these would help in deciding whether they were fleeing others, fleeing some force or leaving because they felt the area was unsafe for some reason.
And of course, how much of the little info we have has been distorted, or is an embellishment?