Well, that's the suspicion dear boy...
[Werewolf] [Archive] In Cuba, I Lie. Day 6: The End. Innocents Win! Host: Locke
- Thread starter Locke Foreer
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
arbites_augmented
Count
But, I suppose, we all knew that Villy was spamming back then when he said that, so I think that we're chasing people that're irrelevant.
Spam or no spam he came out with something accurate that none of us knew at the time.
Things could have meant Vampires, Golems, Walking Dicks, Cushion Thieves but you seemed to get it right.
LighthouseGuard
Knight at Arms
Holy crap, almost forgot about this thread... things are just moving too fast.
I've read someone get a lot of **** for guessing that there was an SK and the SK was an elephant in a mafia game related to the Second Punic War. That was far more epic than this, and he was pure townie too. But Villie's posting feels to me like scum doing the active lurking thing. To those who misunderstand this phrase - it means pretending to be active by posting a lot, but not actually saying a lot.
When I got back in the night to re-read, I too felt that gamerwiz was being scummy. I would've voted him otherwise. But not when there was a gun we could have used, and which we could have lost for many many reasons... CA's behavior led us to his case, didn't it? I do not feel this reason suffices. vote: Trooper.
Some spammy spam along the way, but I got here! Woot!
I've read someone get a lot of **** for guessing that there was an SK and the SK was an elephant in a mafia game related to the Second Punic War. That was far more epic than this, and he was pure townie too. But Villie's posting feels to me like scum doing the active lurking thing. To those who misunderstand this phrase - it means pretending to be active by posting a lot, but not actually saying a lot.
Trooper5445 said:
When I got back in the night to re-read, I too felt that gamerwiz was being scummy. I would've voted him otherwise. But not when there was a gun we could have used, and which we could have lost for many many reasons... CA's behavior led us to his case, didn't it? I do not feel this reason suffices. vote: Trooper.
You remember how KoC's game had those day items and night items? At least you could ask (whether Tarrant lies or not in reply is another matter altogether).Trooper5445 said:
Then again, why would a pro-town player steal the gun if they thought they could make it work the way they wanted it to just by posting to ask Tarrant to kill someone? As far as I know any day-killing item is property of the town. Plus, this sort of ability must be used in very limited ways, so if I were a pro-town thief I definitely won't waste it on that. I feel that it's some sort of villain trying to increase the number of people they can kill. And didn't Bugman have a role like that earlier?Tarrantmw said:
Some spammy spam along the way, but I got here! Woot!
Day 2: Vote Count #1
Xardob: 2 (Oubliette, Alex_Augmented)
Vilhjalmr: 3 (Tarrant, Lamjoe, Redcoat-Mic)
Redcoat-Mic: 2 (Trooper, Vilhjalmr)
Trooper: 1 (LighthouseGuard)
Just a reminder. Remember to unvote before you vote. I know this hasn't actually been a problem yet, but I've come to realise that vote counts are easier to mess up than you would think.
Xardob: 2 (Oubliette, Alex_Augmented)
Vilhjalmr: 3 (Tarrant, Lamjoe, Redcoat-Mic)
Redcoat-Mic: 2 (Trooper, Vilhjalmr)
Trooper: 1 (LighthouseGuard)
Just a reminder. Remember to unvote before you vote. I know this hasn't actually been a problem yet, but I've come to realise that vote counts are easier to mess up than you would think.
Trooper5445
Master Knight
Locke specifically stated it was distributed randomly so it could have been given to a villain.
Locke said:
Oubliette
Count
Ativan said:
I'm actually surprised nobody else mentioned it, given that it was standard practice in the game I hosted whenever someone got hold of a weapon. The only reason it wasn't suggested was because there were only around four hours between Locke distributing the rifle and Trooper placing the final vote.
Not to mention if he was either Trooper or Mic, who placed votes after the rifle was distributed... but there are too many assumptions involved to make such a line of reasoning ultimately useful when it's so easy for villains to simply raise alternative hypotheses.Xardob said:
Funny, I got the impression he wanted to lynch him (here)...
I got the impression he wanted Tarrant to kill Gamer form that same post. It show it's at least badly worded, if not purposeful confusing. And you're right, assuming anything about the thief isn't safe, but we should still try, maybe we get it right and he spill it.Oubliette said:
Trooper5445
Master Knight
If the Thief is good and he spills it then we just have another dead special. There is a reason specials are supposed to operate in the dark. You know this and that seems exceptionally Wolfy.
Unvote
Vote: XARDOB
Unvote
Vote: XARDOB
We are already working under the assumption the thief exist, you will also assume he's good? There are several questions to be answered before I accept the possibility of a good thief. What benefit would he be to the ship? Is there a specific reason he didn't trust Tarrant? Is he so important the wolves will get out of their way to kill him? Is the role interesting enough to exist at all? I'm sure I could find a few more. I don't think there is a thief, but since Villy mentioned some possibilities, I mentioned some too.
I highly doubt that there is an actual thief role. If one does exist though, I would assume that the role would not be pro-town. I cant think of how a "thief" would help the town much. Also the problem with a thief role is that in order to use the item you stole, you would have to reveal yourself. Doesnt make sense to me.
Hey don't look at me, I'm trying to get Villy to swing.
It was him.
