General WNL Conversation Thread
- Thread starter captain lust
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
- Status
Who else is confused and excited by the use of Simoleons in the new ruleset?
He means the § sign 
PTS and then by RW.
It was briefly mentioned in at least the last WNL-suggestion-thread, and I considered doing another stupid poll (after the incredible popular 8vs8/10vs10-poll (including the completely ignored 9vs9-compromise)) regarding it after the last WNL: What are everyone's thoughts/preferences regarding a first-to-9 format instead of a best-of-16?
Also: Back to the roots - map and/or faction-choosing? Ruined Fort all the way.
Also: Back to the roots - map and/or faction-choosing? Ruined Fort all the way.
I posted this here because it isn't a suggestion but still has some relevance with regard to the current WNL/a hypothetical tournament (e.g. would a first-to-9 change anything regarding the teams' standings, or the size and number of participating teams; would map-choosing cease the (sometimes justified) whining regarding the new maps and/or the bugs of some old maps, increase the possible size of the map-pool in general and therefore the map-variety - or would the opposite be the case).
**** twitter.
I would prefer best of 16, there is no particular advantage; it's just something I'm used to.ModusTollens said:
I would change the flag system though. Making the flag appear 20 - 30 seconds after teams spawn to make the game faster and more entertaining.
That'd be so sick tho imagine having spawned just made your drops and the flag spawns.
Yeah then you'd be like yolo and charge and murder everybody.
Who said I stopped listening to them??
- Status
