</br> Read more at: http://www.taleworlds.com/en/Games/Bannerlord/Blog/9
Mount&Blade II: Bannerlord Developer Blog 8 - Engine Power [VIDEO]
- Thread starter captain lust
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
I don't know about you guys, but I found this fairly entertaining to read.
1076364864 Bananas2 So that's ~ 32808 bananas per side
I have also found out that people have been skipping school to play warband at home instead
MaHuD said:
1076364864 Bananas2 So that's ~ 32808 bananas per side
I'm sorry, please forgive me. I couldn't resist.
Mods I hope will be made or return in Bannerlord, in better shape than ever before:
- An Elder Scrolls mod
- The return of the Persistent World (the ploughs are already in
)
- A medieval mod like 1257AD for Warband.
- Game of Thrones mod
- A mod set in ancient Greece, Rome, Sparta, Persia, Japan or China
- Full Invasion
and so on...
Also the heightmaps... the mountaneous region in the video looked very nice and realistic.
Water looked nice too (will it be possible to swim this time around?).
...when is the next blog?
- An Elder Scrolls mod
- The return of the Persistent World (the ploughs are already in
)- A medieval mod like 1257AD for Warband.
- Game of Thrones mod
- A mod set in ancient Greece, Rome, Sparta, Persia, Japan or China
- Full Invasion
and so on...
Also the heightmaps... the mountaneous region in the video looked very nice and realistic.
Water looked nice too (will it be possible to swim this time around?).
...when is the next blog?
MaHuD said:
jacobhinds said:
Note that Warband's limit can be achieved only through increasing each polygon's size, which in turn leads to sacrificing fine-grain terrain control. What we've seen in the Bannerlord video doesn't seem to suffer from this, as the terrain looks pretty sweet even at the limit.
Yep. Using the terrain codes you can make a scene pretty darn large. But it seems to cause a CTD every time you try to autogenerate an ai mesh, so be prepared to do the whole thing manually if there are buildings present.
Chompster said:
I agree, that looks really good, a beautiful looking game in general they have there. I do wonder if it looks as good when unarmoured characters are struck with axes or spears (since they are likely to go deeper into the body in real life than a sword slash). Looks great though, I am looking forward to that one.
EDIT: The video in this blog was put up on Youtube by Taleworlds at the weekend and has had 164,000 views, pretty good
Chompster said:
However, the combat system is very different. KC: D uses preset moves that strike the same place on the enemy in the same way every time, unlike M&B, where the player isn't locked on to one enemy and can attack anywhere on any foe from any angle. That's why it's cheap for Warhorse to do context sensitive reaction animations; the contexts are extremely limited compared to those in any Taleworlds game.
Antar said:
You can fiddle around using this tool here to find the largest map size; increasing the polygon size does map the map bigger overall, but it does make it considerably more difficult to add detail to the terrain, be it texture detail or landscaping.
gkx said:
Sweeeet. So that means ArmA 2 (Chernarus) sized maps (at max). Very impressive.
As long as we're both on the same page with this then it doesn't really matter. Sorry for the "troll" comment, I was tired and frustrated with something else. Shouldn't have been posting in the first place.Meevar the Mighty said:
Also, "and" can be used to start a sentence. I wouldn't recommend it for formal writing, but it's not technically wrong (same for "but" and "or"). For Thegn's remark about OED grammarians, here's such a source: http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2012/01/can-i-start-a-sentence-with-a-conjunction/
I don't have a problem with you emphesizing the start of your sentence fragment, but I'll be damned if there's any reason for superfluous conjunctions to be acceptable in English. I concede that you have the support of the Oxford school of impudent tosh if you really have the cheek to persist in such devilry, but it breaks my heart that you would suggest it.
"Also" is less offensive for some reason.
Apology accepted and again, I'm sorry to have attracted your ire.
"Also" is less offensive for some reason.
Apology accepted and again, I'm sorry to have attracted your ire.
Matiss_Veinbergs
Banned
I like "also"
I didn't get the "also" part.
SPARTACUS_7
Recruit
when will the next blog be revealed to us cant wait for this game
Admiral Nelson
Sergeant at Arms
SPARTACUS_7 said:
It will be released on October 5th...
...
2017
Feed me your tears!
Tatari_okan said:
Whilst it means the same thing as 'and', 'also' is more commonly used to start a new sentence. I often use it when making a number of points about a subject. So Meevar was acknowledging the double standards many English speakers like us apply to this issue of how to start a sentence.
I have used 'And' before, but prefer not to; it doesn't seem quite right, but all the alternatives grate on my nerves a little too. There doesn't seem to be a viable alternative sometimes than to being a sentence with one of these words, but the sentence feels a little awkward for being written in this way. For example, if I was contesting a statement made by another forum member and had multiple criticisms to make, I would make one criticism in my first or second sentence, after which I would address the second criticism in the next sentence. Invariably in this case my instinct would be to choose a word such as 'also' or 'furthermore' to begin this sentence, but I think it sounds inelegant. On the other hand, if the post I am responding to had made multiple distinct statements (as opposed to one), then I can comfortably write my post by beginning the second and subsequent sentences with words such as 'regarding' (e.g. Regarding couched lancing....) or simply omitting any preceding words and going straight into the essence of the subject (e.g. Couched lancing is not overpowered because...).
SPARTACUS_7
Recruit
i hope there are npc like a spy or an assasin
