And if anyone still isn't convinced to vote for Tuckles, here's why you should. Just remember that Adaham already did a very good analysis about him on
this post, so I may be repeating some stuff.
Tuckles said:
I can't help but feel overlooked here guys.
He starts by deflecting attention from the fact that he was absent up till that point. That's for us to think he's actually being active in the hunt.
Regarding this whole ComingWinter thing, I just want to drop my two cents.
Any comment that starts like this is already a bad sign.
I agree that immediately distancing yourself from a post is rather dodgy stuff, but the accusations of "overly defensive" are kind of nonsense. You have already pressed the attack. She has no chocie but to defend herself or be deemed "wolfish", but defending herself already deems her "wolfish". ****ed if she does, ****ed if she doesn't isn't it?
The actual comment. At best, it's just an opinion that let's him pend to either side later. At worst it's a wolf preparing himself to jump on a safe bandwagon. First he agrees with the argument for CW being suspicious, he's careful enough to not offer one himself. This is so he can add his vote later to achieve a lynch, if needed. Then he prepares the terrain to back out of the position if the opinion of the village turns against CW being suspicious. By painting the victim in a unwinnable position, he can later claim that the entire lynch was an accident and that the one responsible for it was the lynched player, for making the mistakes that got her into that position. He even leaves room to accuse those that helped to add pressure. Really, if all went well, he wouldn't even need to vote CW to play this card, or could vote her with a reason like this 'I'm not actually suspicious of CW, but among the players that have a chance of being lynched, she is the best bet'.
With that said, I'll Unvote and see how this progresses for a while.
The backing out that was coming since the beginning of the post. That's his admission that he's waiting for the village to take a position before committing one way or another.
I understand the thought process behind this pressure, and honestly it's still an avenue to pursue.
Meaning: 'I support this course of action, but don't actually expect me to dirt my hands'.
Bringing up some issues (i.e. putting them in the forefront), would just detract from the current line and I could be accused of wolfish behavior by taking the heat off an alleged packmate.
That's the only part of the post that makes me doubt a little, but only so because it's so blatant I find difficult to believe a wolf would actually say that. This is him just giving a bad excuse to not change topics because he is happy with the village not discussing him or his packmates.
And the most wolfish comment of all:
I'd just like to remind you guys not to get tunnel vision and remember that there are 11 of us playing this game.
There's nothing more wolfish than commenting on the hunt like this without actually saying anything about any of the players.
