Kurdistan Workers' Party

Users who are viewing this thread

Wellenbrecher said:
I don't really look at the screen when clicking on the topics more often than not. I always expect this to be the bloody kitten thread somehow because of the K  and general length of the title >.>
Bitterly disappointed five times in a row now.
Here you go.
Eh8GEgl.png
 
I don't think anyone who is not Turkish is reasonably claiming that Turkey's government is innocent of anything. Both groups are corrupt and morally bankrupt.

The Dark Robin said:
Goker, there's an agreement when you register for the forum that Taleworlds is not responsible for what their forumites write.
That's not really relevant, those disclaimers have little to no legal bearing. Filefront was 'not responsible' for what their users uploaded, but they still got the smack down. This is also ignoring the fact that the Turkish government uses the legal system as a puppet and therefore even rock-solid legal definitions can be swept away.
 
The Dark Robin said:
Wellenbrecher said:
The **** did you google about them that lead you to believe they hadn't used terrorism to try to achieve their goals?
No, I knew about Kurdistan before this, just not that PKK stood for a party in Kurdistan.

The Turkish position that the Kurds are terrorists is purely political, the Syrian Kurds are currently engaged in a war against both extremist elements in the FSA and Assad's dictatorship.
The PKK has KILLED people.
Killing people is not part of an ordinary political process. D: (Unless they are brown, jews, gays, disabled or even Disabled Ethiopian Jews Who Are Gay.*)
I think you need to see a shrink, since you obviously do not know how to function in society. :C


*If you are reading this, take an English class or just pick up a f'ing dictionary and look up Satire, feciciousness, dry humour . etc.
 
Kobrag said:
The PKK has KILLED people.
So has every government in the world, and many continue to do so, including modern countries.

Kobrag said:
I think you need to see a shrink, since you obviously do not know how to function in society. :C
I don't think you're in any position to be giving that advice based on someone's mere political ignorance.
 
I don't agree on the government's attitude towards PKK nor towards Kurds too, however if you brand yourself as leading an independence movement you'd do well not to inflict harm on innocents. I gotta admit I used to agree that violence can be considered an act against oppression, especially if that was an independence movement, till I learned about the movement of the Crimean Turks, and also John Stuart Mill's views on liberty.

If you guys are interested, I suggest you take a look at the deportation of Crimean Turks and Mustafa Dzhemilev's struggle because of the rarity of his motives as being non-violent right from its start till this day.
 
Given the ceasefire with the PKK I'm a bit surprised that there hasn't been more of a legal rapprochement with the PKK. If the ceasefire is to be permanent peace there will have to come a time in which it is no longer unacceptable to say anything positive about them.
 
Mage246 said:
Given the ceasefire with the PKK I'm a bit surprised that there hasn't been more of a legal rapprochement with the PKK.
It's coming. Just before the presidential elections too.

The Dark Robin said:
Goker, there's an agreement when you register for the forum that Taleworlds is not responsible for what their forumites write.
Turkey banned Twitter and Youtube. You think that ****ty line is going to stand against the government?
 
Austupaio said:
I don't think anyone who is not Turkish is reasonably claiming that Turkey's government is innocent of anything. Both groups are corrupt and morally bankrupt.

My point being that the AKP is as bad or worse than the PKK, and the only reason that they aren't designated as a terrorist group is because they have influence with the west. They are, after all, harboring terrorists.

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.

Thanks Goker for advancing my point. The AKP has also banned Twitter and Youtube, all the more reason to dislike them.
 
There's a slight difference between banning Internet sites, and using car bombs.

Sure, PKK isn't Al-Qaeda or the Shining Path, but they are a terrorist organization deservedly. Do I think that the Kurds should have a country of their own? Yes, I do. That, however, doesn't justify terror acts.
 
Well yeah, but they're also making the transition from being the IRA to being Sinn Fein, to use the Irish analogy. Some acknowledgement of that will be due very soon, in an official capacity when it comes to terrorist listings.
 
The Dark Robin said:
My point being that the AKP is as bad or worse than the PKK, and the only reason that they aren't designated as a terrorist group is because they have influence with the west. They are, after all, harboring terrorists.
I called you stupid for the following.

The Dark Robin said:
The Turkish position that the Kurds are terrorists is purely political...
You designated PKK as "Kurds". There are a lot of countries and nations that consider PKK terrorists and yet not Kurds. Turkey also doesn't consider Kurds "terrorists". As for the individuals in the Republic of Turkey, answers vary.

I also fail to see why AKP would be different from PKK for having influence in the west. They're different because AKP is the elected government of the Republic of Turkey and whilst both the Turkish Government and PKK has killed people, the motives were really different.
 
Goker said:
You designated PKK as "Kurds". There are a lot of countries and nations that consider PKK terrorists and yet not Kurds. Turkey also doesn't consider Kurds "terrorists". As for the individuals in the Republic of Turkey, answers vary.

I also fail to see why AKP would be different from PKK for having influence in the west. They're different because AKP is the elected government of the Republic of Turkey and whilst both the Turkish Government and PKK has killed people, the motives were really different.
Meh, according to a Vice report I saw, the Turkish election was somewhat rigged. You would probably know more about that than me, but I can dig it up if you want. :smile:

Jhessail said:
There's a slight difference between banning Internet sites, and using car bombs.

Sure, PKK isn't Al-Qaeda or the Shining Path, but they are a terrorist organization deservedly. Do I think that the Kurds should have a country of their own? Yes, I do. That, however, doesn't justify terror acts.
Then how do you suggest the country of Kurdistan is established, without a war of independence?

As for your one-liner, banning internet sites has practically no good use besides shutting down child porn, while car bombs can be used for good, just as guns and other weapons can. Also, the AKP is not only infringing on Turkish liberty, but harboring terrorist elements of the FSA who go directly into attacking Syrian Kurdistan.
 
The Dark Robin said:
while car bombs can be used for good
They could, but they're not. I say this as someone who supports militant revolution, car bombs are a terrorist's weapon, through and through.
 
Back
Top Bottom