Overgaul said:
NA did something actually yes ma bad. You still have presented zero arguments other than ad hominems towards supporters and the carefully thought "because it's bollocks".
Oh, you were serious. First of all: I reject many thing I haven't even tried, not doing so would be pretty stupid and stupidly dangerous. Secondly: I don't reject the idea of money prizes in tournaments, I said, several times, that it's delusional as far as Warband is concerned (as for why can be read in the 2 years old thread, as well as here, not only written by me but by everybody who argued along the line that it would "destroy the already small playerbase" or "the lack of working anti-cheat-measurements are problematic" etc.; just because you seem to have overlooked it, doesn't mean it isn't there), and that noone has any reason to care as far as Warband isn't concerned.
You also have to point out any ad hominem (except for the one just yet - although that one is true, so whatever), I seem to have a tendency to overlook them.
The only thing I reject in general is the idea that the involvement of money has to be seen as "progress" or "development" (as it is reiterated all the time, hence the "baaing"-quote from 2 years ago), which just isn't true (especially as far as Warband is concerned), or that the involvement of money equals an increased playerbase, which just isn't necessarily true (again especially as far as Warband is concerned) or desirable (that one is just my opinion though).
Everyone is free to organise tournaments in whatever manner they want, I couldn't give less of a ****, especially about those I wouldn't participate in, and I'm still puzzled why some people do - except maybe for Lust. (I'd probably still be interested in the used ruleset.
) Since that has nothing to do with the WNL anyway, I'm out.
