Would be nice if you guys would have stayed on topic.
Captain Lust said:Congrats Bliv. You're now operating on Mok's level.
The stats are cool. I wouldn't worry too much about balancing them for input or whatever. There's nothing wrong with the criteria being somewhat arbitrary. It's still interesting to see who scores high.
Suggestions for stats that I would find interesting:
Top players by total kills
Top players by (total kills - deaths)/rounds
Top players by rounds played x total kills
Top players by K/D x rounds played
Top players by K/D (using only players with maximum rounds played)
Didn't see that.... it does only cover the total kills thing though!Folms said:
I didn't even think of this, thankssammac said:What about using a number like .5 or .75 for those with no deaths, think sota did this.
sammac said:What about using a number like .5 or .75 for those with no deaths, think sota did this.
kills/ rounds sounds like a better statistic to me, deaths aren't really that relevant as far as I can see