[ECS] Suggestions

Shoxi · Oct 7, 2013

~Scar said:
The following rules about rosters and ID's apply;
..

Players who are not on a team's roster and play in match will not be punished unless they are already on another team's roster. Their ID will be added to the roster of the team they played for after the match.

..

Lets say one scenario, for crucial match one team includes 5 players who can make decisive advantage in match without registering them (names) on roster before match, players are not on any other roster.
This team and these players won't be punished in any way if this happens? For opposing team it would be unpleasant surprise in match. How this will be handled?

Shemaforash · Oct 7, 2013

Shoxi said:
~Scar said:

The following rules about rosters and ID's apply;
..

Players who are not on a team's roster and play in match will not be punished unless they are already on another team's roster. Their ID will be added to the roster of the team they played for after the match.

..

Click to expand...

Lets say one scenario, for crucial match one team includes 5 players who can make decisive advantage in match without registering them (names) on roster before match, players are not on any other roster.
This team and these players won't be punished in any way if this happens? For opposing team it would be unpleasant surprise in match. How this will be handled?

I don't really see anything wrong with that.

captain lust · Oct 7, 2013

Shemaforash said:
Shoxi said:

~Scar said:

The following rules about rosters and ID's apply;
..

Players who are not on a team's roster and play in match will not be punished unless they are already on another team's roster. Their ID will be added to the roster of the team they played for after the match.

..

Click to expand...

Lets say one scenario, for crucial match one team includes 5 players who can make decisive advantage in match without registering them (names) on roster before match, players are not on any other roster.
This team and these players won't be punished in any way if this happens? For opposing team it would be unpleasant surprise in match. How this will be handled?

Click to expand...

I don't really see anything wrong with that.

It kind of defeats the purpose of having a team and limits any ability to prepare specifically for an opponent. It's also not exactly in the spirit of a tournament for a team to just switch up their roster on the fly. It would be beneficial for the atmosphere and storyline of the tournament if there was some decent continuation here.

ryozu · Oct 7, 2013

So a clan couldn't bring any new members who haven't played for anyone else into the tournament? That's sort of... harsh.

Killfacer · Oct 7, 2013

Updated the rules to close a few loop-holes and make them more specific to the style of tournament this is.

pro.fail · Oct 7, 2013

The intro is ****ing epic, nice job Thunderon!

Shoxi · Oct 7, 2013

Killfacer said:
Updated the rules to close a few loop-holes and make them more specific to the style of tournament this is.

Thx Deacon, it is clearer.

I would not be too strict to hold this rule for first round in group stage:

Teams may only play 3 or less players that are not currently on their roster in a match.

Killfacer · Oct 7, 2013

Yeah i'll add something about that, good thinking.

Newbiejunky · Oct 12, 2013

Is it sure that we're going play these maps?

Closed Maps
1 - Fort of Honour
2 - Mountain Fortress
3 - San'di'boush
4 - Vendetta
5 - Verloren
6 - Village

Open Maps
1 - Field by the River
2 - Frosty Battle
3 - Reveran Village
4 - Ruins
5 - Snowy Village

Killfacer · Oct 12, 2013

Not 100% yet, will try and get the definitive list up by the middle of next week. Maps that may not be included:

Village, Snowy Village. The rest are definitely staying.

Vivar · Oct 13, 2013

Keep both, Snowy Village may be terrible in public but in scrims it is interesting.

sotamursu123 · Oct 13, 2013

http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?topic=270894.0

pro edits for deleted native maps.

Newbiejunky · Oct 13, 2013

Village is definetly interesting.

However, and it's my personal opinion, Snowy Village sucks as hard in public as in matchs.

sotamursu123 · Oct 13, 2013

Newbiejunky said:
Village is definetly interesting.

However, and it's my personal opinion, Snowy Village sucks as hard in public as in matchs.

sucks in both, simply sucks harder in public =D

Wezyk · Oct 13, 2013

Newbiejunky said:
Village is definetly interesting.

Ye I've always liked Village

Arthasan · Oct 14, 2013

Nord Town? :cry:

+Varsung+ · Oct 15, 2013

Everyone likes Nord Town!

Newbiejunky · Oct 15, 2013

+Varsung+ said:
Everyone likes Nord Town!

I don't.

It's ok in public, but it doesn't fit for a match imo.

Cleric_Johnson · Oct 15, 2013

Newbiejunky said:
+Varsung+ said:

Everyone likes Nord Town!

Click to expand...

I don't.

It's ok in public, but it doesn't fit for a match imo.

Agreed. It nearly always leads to camping. Also there's practically no options for interesting tactics. Not even good for pubbing with the horrendous shooting positions.

22nd_TK_Ceasar · Oct 15, 2013

Cleric_Johnson said:
Newbiejunky said:

+Varsung+ said:

Everyone likes Nord Town!

Click to expand...

I don't.

It's ok in public, but it doesn't fit for a match imo.

Click to expand...

Agreed. It nearly always leads to camping. Also there's practically no options for interesting tactics. Not even good for pubbing with the horrendous shooting positions.

Exact! that makes us loving Nord Town, we just wait for flags, and then we go to the flags! Awesome map

[ECS] Suggestions

Users who are viewing this thread

Baron

Marquis

Duke

Baron

Marquis

Sergeant Knight

Baron

Marquis

Knight at Arms

Marquis

Baron

On probation

Knight at Arms

On probation

Sergeant Knight

Knight

Grandmaster Knight

Knight at Arms

Baron

Baron

Similar threads