the respect man
No. He was forced into prostitution to get me money.Alene said:the respect man said:with all my awesomeness pwned King Ragnar with a spoon.
Were you by any chance playing as King Harlaus?
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Users who are viewing this thread
- Status
Scully said:
It's just my opinion, but in some circumstances, like when you are landing a blow with a heavy weapon, even if you are hit, you shouldn't get interrupted. There should be some sort of "poise" (like in Dark Souls, but variable, as you're not always so susceptible to being stunned by a blow) that prevents you from being stunned wearing a heavy plate armour because someone has kicked you.
PD: Just my opinion
well as for me f.e. new engine could support decals, so we could see blood pools or blood stains after hit. For blood feud and bloodlust guys (like me 
). Anyways it's not that important but I hate clear, unmessed ground after battle (only corpses).
). Anyways it's not that important but I hate clear, unmessed ground after battle (only corpses).
Oh Google, how thou holdest me dearly in thy mighty gripe; bysmorful display!Jock said:
How I loath mine eyes for seeing what cannot be unseen.
Seriously though, you must be mistaking "Mount & Blade 2: Bannerlord" with "Mounting Babes 2: Bonerlord"; both in open DreamBeta.
If they implement "proper" throwing weapons, with inertia and all, I could agree that should you kill an enemy who was going to crush you with a battle hammer, then his weapon should probably keep its momentum as it smashes into your face. However, in other cases, it would feel wrong I think. I have a hard time imagining anyone completing a swing after being stabbed.Yabloko said:
I always considered "attack stun" to be an abstraction of the guy being attacked somehow defending himself (via recoil) so the attacker doesn't completely assassinate him.
Another option could be a form of power attack, berserker style: longer to swing back, longer to recover from a failed attack, it stuns whoever tries to block it, but any melee damage taken while swinging results in an instant death. That I wouldn't mind
This is signature-worthy, if I put quotes in my signature in the future.Marmz said:
BacCompany3
Sergeant
The waiting has driven some to make nude mods. WHYYY !!!!? 
I'm a hipster, I still play Whorerider.
Rey Don Carlos
Recruit
Can't wait for this game. Let's hope it can be even better than Warband, that is, along with his mods, already an excellent game.
ur urAntar said:
I'm also hoping for an overhaul of the overall physics system, which would allow for that sort of thing.Yabloko said:
In the alpha video, the scene where a horseman is moving diagonally also shows a table full of items.
It's my wet dream that it serves to test throwing physics, and that it's not there solely to give a sense of scale and aesthetic cohesion.
I'll bring wine and chocolate; proportionally more of the former.Tork789 said:
About the combat system discussion from a few pages ago, and how M&B's combat system is better than Chivalry's: One idea I do like from Chivalry is the fact that you can't hold your block; that is, if you're going to block than you have to time it right, rather than just holding the block button down. That's a feature they could implement in the Bannerlord combat system.
If I recall correctly, Chivalry also doesn't let people hold their attacks. I don't know if I want that.
NO.Sir Arvondor said:
That's the whole point. It's what separates Mount & Blade from a Run-around-and-hit-things game.
Build on the current system. I haven't spent thousands of hours playing this game to think that it should follow Chivalry's style.
Holding blocks and attacks are of immense value to the gameplay.
- Status
Similar threads
