Gulatr
Squire
As I have not found any other thread to discuss the matter, I decided to post it here.
I propose the following:
1) Raise the player minimum in matches to at least 10 vs 10 - this will allow more players to take part, increase importance of teamplay and tactics, but most importantly, it will allow more players to actually play and have fun rather then being on the bench. I do not see any reason for the NC to use such tiny teams, it is breaking the purpose tactical preperation.
I understand that some teams have problems fielding 8 players, there are solutions for such cases -
A - Consider a merger with another team, like many nations with a small player base already have done.
B - If a merger is not possible, then make a rule that these specific teams will only play under the minimum of 8 vs 8.
I totally disagree that NC needs to have such tiny matches, we are talking about National teams, most of which can field 10 players with ease on any given day. Why force a reduction of the scale, when we already have a good system that has proven itself in the past (in ENL and all clan matches). Those teams that have problems with the scale, will be given the right to "force" the opposition to play with the minimum 8 vs 8. That right should not however be standard for everyone, but only for the few teams that actually need that(organisers know who should be given this right).
2) Allow a larger roster of 18 or 20 players, this is to adjust to the 10 vs 10 in terms of player pool.
3) make a poll so that team captains can vote for this proposal.
Personal note: I see no logical reason for connecting the NC with the "planned experimintation" in the ENL, there are problems but there are other ways to solve them. By reducing the scale you harm the enjoyment of the participants, and make players sit on the bench, players that would otherwise be fielded on both sides.
The ENL and NC are two totaly different tournaments and should not be treated the same!
I propose the following:
1) Raise the player minimum in matches to at least 10 vs 10 - this will allow more players to take part, increase importance of teamplay and tactics, but most importantly, it will allow more players to actually play and have fun rather then being on the bench. I do not see any reason for the NC to use such tiny teams, it is breaking the purpose tactical preperation.
I understand that some teams have problems fielding 8 players, there are solutions for such cases -
A - Consider a merger with another team, like many nations with a small player base already have done.
B - If a merger is not possible, then make a rule that these specific teams will only play under the minimum of 8 vs 8.
I totally disagree that NC needs to have such tiny matches, we are talking about National teams, most of which can field 10 players with ease on any given day. Why force a reduction of the scale, when we already have a good system that has proven itself in the past (in ENL and all clan matches). Those teams that have problems with the scale, will be given the right to "force" the opposition to play with the minimum 8 vs 8. That right should not however be standard for everyone, but only for the few teams that actually need that(organisers know who should be given this right).
2) Allow a larger roster of 18 or 20 players, this is to adjust to the 10 vs 10 in terms of player pool.
3) make a poll so that team captains can vote for this proposal.
Personal note: I see no logical reason for connecting the NC with the "planned experimintation" in the ENL, there are problems but there are other ways to solve them. By reducing the scale you harm the enjoyment of the participants, and make players sit on the bench, players that would otherwise be fielded on both sides.
The ENL and NC are two totaly different tournaments and should not be treated the same!