The average is 100. It gets reset to this for every generation.
Night Ninja said:A simple number tells you **** all about someones IQ since there are different tests with different scales. 140 on one could be 100 on the other.
Swadius said:The average is 100. It gets reset to this for every generation.
Calodine said:It's just logic. You could be the most logical person on earth and get something silly like 300 and still be an idiot.
(160ish, IIRC)
EdwardWellcraft said:Calodine said:It's just logic. You could be the most logical person on earth and get something silly like 300 and still be an idiot.
(160ish, IIRC)
You can't be logical and stupid. That's... illogical. Logic is one of the primary things that defines intelligence in humans. And there is at least correlation between IQ and other measures of intelligence we use. Those with higher IQs will generally do better in school, make more money, live longer, and so on. It's not like it it's not a direct measurement of intelligence but it does give you a rough idea of how you compare to the "norm," which in this case is 100.
For the lols I took a quick IQ test online and it gave me 127, which seems fairly reasonable.
And I'm pretty sure what Swadius says is true. 100 is intended to be the average for these tests so if the average starts to shift they then shift around the 100 position. It's a relative form of measurement, not an absolute one.
Lord Burgess1 said:69, oh yeah I can kill someone in America and can get away with it!
Revilo said:Well I just randomly clicked an answer each time, took all of a minute. Final IQ? 113. What a crock of ****.
EdwardWellcraft said:Revilo said:Well I just randomly clicked an answer each time, took all of a minute. Final IQ? 113. What a crock of ****.
Randomly clicking answers will ALWAYS give you a false report. Take it again and you're going to get another random number, while those who tried to answer to the best of their ability should get something reasonably close to their first try.
NordArcher said:Lord Burgess1 said:69, oh yeah I can kill someone in America and can get away with it!
Kill a christian pl0x?
Lord Burgess1 said:NordArcher said:Lord Burgess1 said:69, oh yeah I can kill someone in America and can get away with it!
Kill a christian pl0x?
...
FrisianDude said:Okay, **** you. Bill Gates is awesome.
Therefore, my hero. Also; this.NordArcher said:FrisianDude said:Okay, **** you. Bill Gates is awesome.
He's rich.
I disagree, a lot of people with high IQ can be very stupid, and even in different ways. For an example, autistic children can either be mentally retarded or supergenuises, this does not actually mean anything, since those considered mentally retarded can be perfectly fine intelligence wise, and altough the supergenuises have a high IQ, they completely suck at everything else such as tying your shoelaces and human interaction. There is different kinds of IQ, and the test is not sufficiant to say if someone is actually smart or not, since people in general takes more things into account, such as human interaction, common knowledge and etc. IQ does not tell if you are good at these things. Which is sort of necessary to get somewhere in life.EdwardWellcraft said:Calodine said:It's just logic. You could be the most logical person on earth and get something silly like 300 and still be an idiot.
(160ish, IIRC)
You can't be logical and stupid. That's... illogical. Logic is one of the primary things that defines intelligence in humans. And there is at least correlation between IQ and other measures of intelligence we use. Those with higher IQs will generally do better in school, make more money, live longer, and so on. It's not like it it's not a direct measurement of intelligence but it does give you a rough idea of how you compare to the "norm," which in this case is 100.
For the lols I took a quick IQ test online and it gave me 127, which seems fairly reasonable.
And I'm pretty sure what Swadius says is true. 100 is intended to be the average for these tests so if the average starts to shift they then shift around the 100 position. It's a relative form of measurement, not an absolute one.